[Fix] Unordered equal transactions wrongly matched
The nullifier algorithm was wrongly assuming that it would received an ordered sequence of transactions. When combined with the cancelation search only looking forward, this could cause the algorithm to not only not throw the `MoreThanOneMatchError`, but also attempt to rewrite a previously matches transaction. The fix is applied both in ordering every sequence of transactions, but also to confirm that a transactions had not previously been found. This should now be impossible given the correct order, but its there to prevent future misshaps. For the specific broken sequence, look at test TestTransform.test_nullifier_inplace_unordered.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d4da4132d
commit
5de3f337cf
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
from copy import deepcopy
|
||||
import datetime as dt
|
||||
from typing import Sequence
|
||||
from typing import Iterable, Sequence
|
||||
|
||||
from .exceptions import MoreThanOneMatchError
|
||||
from .transform import Transformer
|
||||
@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ class Nullifier(Transformer):
|
||||
def __init__(self, rules=None):
|
||||
self.rules = rules if rules else []
|
||||
|
||||
def transform(self, transactions: Sequence[Transaction]) -> Sequence[Transaction]:
|
||||
def transform(self, transactions: Iterable[Transaction]) -> Sequence[Transaction]:
|
||||
"""transform
|
||||
|
||||
Find transactions that nullify each others, e.g. transfers between banks or
|
||||
between bank and credit cards.
|
||||
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
transactions (Sequence[Transaction]): ordered sequence of transactions
|
||||
transactions (Sequence[Transaction]): sequence of transactions
|
||||
|
||||
Raises:
|
||||
MoreThanOneMatchError: if there is more than a match for a single transation
|
||||
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ class Nullifier(Transformer):
|
||||
Sequence[Transaction]: nullified sequence of transactions
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
result = deepcopy(transactions)
|
||||
result = sorted(deepcopy(transactions))
|
||||
|
||||
for i, transaction in enumerate(result[:-1]):
|
||||
if matches := [t for t in result[i + 1 :] if self._cancels(transaction, t)]:
|
||||
@ -47,29 +47,29 @@ class Nullifier(Transformer):
|
||||
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
def transform_inplace(self, transactions: Sequence[Transaction]) -> None:
|
||||
"""_summary_
|
||||
def transform_inplace(self, transactions: Iterable[Transaction]) -> None:
|
||||
"""transform_inplace
|
||||
|
||||
Find transactions that nullify each others, e.g. transfers between banks or
|
||||
between bank and credit cards.
|
||||
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
transactions (Sequence[Transaction]): ordered sequence of transactions that
|
||||
will be modified inplace
|
||||
transactions (Sequence[Transaction]): sequence of transactions that will be
|
||||
modified inplace
|
||||
|
||||
Raises:
|
||||
MoreThanOneMatchError: if there is more than a match for a single transation
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
for transaction in transactions:
|
||||
for transaction in sorted(transactions):
|
||||
if matches := [t for t in transactions if self._cancels(transaction, t)]:
|
||||
if len(matches) > 1:
|
||||
raise MoreThanOneMatchError(f"{transaction} -> {matches}")
|
||||
|
||||
match = matches[0]
|
||||
|
||||
transaction = self._nullify(transaction)
|
||||
match = self._nullify(match)
|
||||
self._nullify(transaction)
|
||||
self._nullify(match)
|
||||
|
||||
def _cancels(self, transaction: Transaction, cancel: Transaction):
|
||||
return (
|
||||
@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ class Nullifier(Transformer):
|
||||
and cancel != transaction
|
||||
and cancel.bank != transaction.bank
|
||||
and cancel.amount == -transaction.amount
|
||||
# even though this class receives uncategorized transactions, they may have
|
||||
# already been nullified before reaching here
|
||||
and not transaction.category
|
||||
and (not cancel.category or cancel.category.name != "null")
|
||||
and (
|
||||
any(r.matches(transaction) for r in self.rules) if self.rules else True
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||
from datetime import date
|
||||
from decimal import Decimal
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
import mocks.categories as mock
|
||||
|
||||
@ -12,6 +13,7 @@ from pfbudget.db.model import (
|
||||
TransactionTag,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from pfbudget.transform.categorizer import Categorizer
|
||||
from pfbudget.transform.exceptions import MoreThanOneMatchError
|
||||
from pfbudget.transform.nullifier import Nullifier
|
||||
from pfbudget.transform.tagger import Tagger
|
||||
from pfbudget.transform.transform import Transformer
|
||||
@ -48,6 +50,36 @@ class TestTransform:
|
||||
for t in transactions:
|
||||
assert t.category == TransactionCategory("null", CategorySelector.nullifier)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nullifier_inplace_unordered(self):
|
||||
transactions = [
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 2), "A2", Decimal("500"), bank="Bank#2"),
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 2), "B1", Decimal("-500"), bank="Bank#1"),
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 1), "A1", Decimal("-500"), bank="Bank#1"),
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 2), "B2", Decimal("500"), bank="Bank#2"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for t in transactions:
|
||||
assert not t.category
|
||||
|
||||
categorizer: Transformer = Nullifier()
|
||||
with pytest.raises(MoreThanOneMatchError):
|
||||
categorizer.transform_inplace(transactions)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nullifier_inplace_repeated(self):
|
||||
transactions = [
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 2), "A1", Decimal("-500"), bank="Bank#1"),
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 2), "A2", Decimal("500"), bank="Bank#2"),
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 2), "B1", Decimal("-500"), bank="Bank#1"),
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 2), "B2", Decimal("500"), bank="Bank#2"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for t in transactions:
|
||||
assert not t.category
|
||||
|
||||
categorizer: Transformer = Nullifier()
|
||||
with pytest.raises(MoreThanOneMatchError):
|
||||
categorizer.transform_inplace(transactions)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nullifier_with_rules(self):
|
||||
transactions = [
|
||||
BankTransaction(date(2023, 1, 1), "", Decimal("-500"), bank="Bank#1"),
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user